Blog move

My blog is now at http://posterous.richardcunningham.co.uk. Thanks.

Clearing up the "Back to the Future" mis-information

There is meme going around that Doc Brown in the film "Back to the Future", was planning to travel forward to this day, before he got gunned down by the Libyans. It all started with this tweet by @totalfilm which is the official Twitter account of the Total Film magazine

So what actually happened in the Film? Doc Brown is about to leave 1985 to go to the future, here's the quote:

"Marty: The future,? So where you going?

Doc: That's right, 25 years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next 25 World Series." (source)

Now, Back to the Future was first released in the USA on the 3rd of July 1985 and that's maybe where the confusion comes from. The current date as shown in the time machine is the 26 October 1985 so it's wrong. Total film did try to correct themselves, but, posting a photoshopped picture, was not the best way and attached tweet was unclear.

It's now 7 hours after the original tweet and people are still passing on this information in vast numbers:

Twitter we have a problem

Twitter is fast moving system and sometimes people make mistakes and I can understand that. Typically the way to resolve this is to send an updated message to all your followers admitting you made a mistake. The problem however, comes in when people start retweeting your incorrect tweet, you can't inform all those who received the incorrect tweet about the error. In fact it gets worse as people remove the original attribution and pass the tweet off as an original tweet of their own (as you can see it the screenshot above). Of course blogs don't have this problem, people simply update the post with new information as it comes to light. Facebook and Blogs also have comments so the post can be shouted down for inaccuracies there, even before the post is updated.

So is this a problem? Well today it's some tweet about meaningless facts from a 25 year old film, but tomorrow it could be mis-information about someone's death for example, though it's not like that hasn't happened before.

Posted via email from Richard Cunningham's posterous

YouTube Hacked

It looks like someone calling themselves "SPONGE" on this page 

 

It looks like they are deliberately using malformed HTML to get past YouTube's checks for HTML sanitisation in the comments. The comment I've seen is using the long forgotten marquee tag and a javascript alert, though in principle it could be expanded to support XSS type flaws.

It looks like YouTube are dealing with this currently be deleting comments presumably until the can fix their code.

I'd suggest staying away from YouTube until they have this fixed or at least logging out of YouTube if you use it.

Posted via email from Richard Cunningham's posterous

iOS devices will and are disrupting the desktop space

In 2007 when Apple unveiled the original iPhone, I was quite surprised they had used OSX as the basis for the operating system. It was notable that they were able use a fully featured operating system on a mobile phone, something that wasn't being done widely at the time and marked the transition of mobile phones from simple devices to scaled down desktop computers. The iPhone OS as it was then known, seemed very basic given that it didn't support 3rd party applications, multi-tasking or copy and paste, however, it has quickly gained these features, this is one of the hallmarks of a disruptive technology:

"Disruptive innovation is a term used in business and technology literature to describe innovations that improve a product or service in ways that the market does not expect" - Wikipedia
The iPhone was disrupting to some low end uses of laptops by allowing web browsing and email on the move without a laptop (they weren't the first on email, but were on the providing the full web). The iPhone was better at these tasks than a laptop by virtue of being smaller, instant on, with GSM networking built in, GPS built in, no noise, no heat, no viruses and simpler to use.

The iPad has continued this disruption by replacing times when you would use a traditional laptop. In fact, in Technologizer's survey of iPad users, around 70% said they were frequently using their iPad instead of their computer. The iPad has the advantage of having a much longer battery life than a laptop, meaning you don't need to plug it in as often, or all during normal use. Also, it benefits from a better form factor for web browsing which is better suited to the easy chairs and sofas where people would normally consume written content such books and magazines. The iPad of course has same benefit as the iPhone of being instant wake which typically laptops don't do - at least not well.

I believe that Apple it's trying to solve it's own innovators delema. Apple's innovators deliema is that computers are getting cheaper and the primary use for many home users is simply to browse the web and not to use many applications, meaning that any advantage Apple has in it's application base and ease of use, could be supplanted by a web browser only system. This will tend to lead to people buying cheaper, simpler devices that only do just that. Apple's problem that very few people will want to pay $1000+ for a Apple laptop, if the only application they ever use is the web browser. It's notable that none of Apple's iOS devices cost more than that $999 mark that it sells it's cheapest laptop for.

So that's the state of Apple's disruption against traditional desktop operating systems, so what's next?

Both iPhone and iPad already support a larger number of games than the Mac, but what if this could be scaled up? Apple could produce an iOS capable device that plugs into your TV, this would provide the same app store type system to directly compete with Nintendo in casual games as well as providing a media centre for watching online video, music, podcasts etc. Also, I wouldn't rule out Apple making a full TV themselves buying the display panel from someone else as they do with the iMac.

Apple could also produce a version of the iPad in the laptop form factor with a rotatable screen. For this type of device there would be the demand for proper multi-tasking support, Intel CPU and CD/DVD drive support, though of course this support already exists in the underlying operating system, Apple just needs to enable an interface in iOS to make it work.

In a similar vein Apple could introduce a version of the iMac running iOS. At some point the iOS would have to stop depending on desktop PC for initial setup, syncing and upgrades as people would not have such as device in the future.

 

Posted via email from Richard Cunningham's posterous

The problem with online advertising

Ars Technica has posted about "Why Ad Blocking is devastating to the sites you love". However it is not us, the readers that are to blame, it's the publishers and advertisers that have created adverts so bad that we need sophosicated ways to work around them. I don't have the same problem with magazines and newspapers and on U.K. TV I actually think some of the advertising is better than many of the programmes.

Why is web advertising so bad?

Lets start in early 90s when I started reading content on the web, back then there were very few ads, a few were animated gifs in banners but it was no major deal. In the early 00s ads got a lot more aggressive with popup adverts and even worse pop-under adverts. Pop-up and Pop-under adverts really destroyed the credibility of advertising for me, since they were actively making the web difficult to use and especially for non-technical people. Of course we solved this with Opera, Firefox and eventually with IE following suit so that every major browser supported blocking pop-ups.

Now, you'd think that advertisers would have learn't there lesson, don't make really adverts annoying or we will find some way to block them.

However they didn't, here are some of the behaviours that annoy me in online advertising today:

  • Animated content. This especially bad when it's in a column next to the content I'm reading, it's flashing in the corner of my eye and I can't read the content. So basically I can't read the content that was the whole purpose of my visit. Why not put this content at the top or bottom, so I can put it out of view while I'm reading?
  • Interstitial advertising. Now we don't have pop-ups, advertisers now think it's slide in a advert from the side over the content before I've read it or even worse cover the whole content with an advert before I can view it. This is again this is stopping me from using the site properly.
  • Ads that make a noise. In this day and age it's quite common for people to play music on their computers and therefore have speakers on or have forgotten to plug in their headphones. However in shared office it's distrubtive and embarasing to have adverts play sounds even when you click on them
  • Poor quality products. For me anything where there is a prize, medical and dental products, weight loss etc.
  • Scammy ads that point to spyware to download. Really no site should have this and really it's the lesser sites that let the side down by continuing to do this.
  • Spinning up the CPU. I use Linux and the Flash support is not the greatest, in particular a Flash advert can often spin up to 100% CPU making they system noisy, slowing it down and wareing down the battery if it's a laptop.

If you are a content site and you don't do the above or you don't anymore, then you probably think your safe, but your not. People have long memories. What other sites do effects how people perceive advertising. People are getting are tuning out of the adverts everywhere they go because they so often irrelevant, so they don't even look at that part of the page.

Better Advertising?

I tried to think about the sites I love and how they handle advertising. The sites I love, are ones that have something so unique that is no replacement for their content. I would hate it if they closed down and would pay if asked to:

I read this because it has some good in-depth articles about kernel development and the only other way to get even close to the would be to read the very busyLinux Kernel Mailing List , which I don't have anywhere near the time to do. LWN actually has a paid option, without paying you get everything a week late, so I have the paid option.

I've followed Anandtech since it started in 1997 and it has consistently provided the most indepth coverage of hardware topics. In a way most of the articles are suggesting you buy some piece of hardware based on the reviews. However to keep the site neutral it advertises places that sell hardware, unfortuately most of the adverts are animated and that's annoying. They do have some context sensitive adverts that sometimes are fairly close to what is being talked about. I think they could innovate a bit here and have a list of the exact products in the review and where you could buy them. I think if the advertising revenue dropped they could do well buy partnering or being bought by a online computer parts retailer. Dpreview was bought by Amazon for example.

Techmeme is not a content site itself, but it a very good way to get an overview of what everyone is talking about. Techmeme have a brilliant model for advertising in that they simply have a section called "Techmeme Sponsor Posts" with some very good content from well known companies, which is often interesting enough to click on

Hackernews
Hackernews is a aggreation site, though it has a fair amount of content, I wouldn't want to be without it. It's not really the stories that come through, but the really good comments on every story that make the site. Hackernews doesn't have any advertising, though the whole thing is a big advertisement for the Ycombinator startup programme and Ycombinator funded startups. I think they must do pretty well out of this since they will surely see a much greater number of startups than their competitors.

Jason Calancis's this week in startups (TWiST) (Video podcast)
I think this content is simply unique, Jason basically brings in his friends to talk about startups and basically that's pretty much everyone in silicon valley and the surrounding area. The content is always very good, due to Jason and guests he has. Jason gets about 25,000 viewers to his show every week and brings in $4,000 every show, $1,000 each for the 4 advert slots he reads, this seems like a very good model to me. TWiST is also a good advert for OpenAngelForum which is Jason's own way to get startups funded, it's clear that promoting this is a genius move by Jason since a lot of the people doing startups watch his show and he knows all the best investors so he can really provide value doing that. 

All this leaves me wondering, What's the future of web content? Is it paid content? More relevant, targeted advertising? Something else?

Posted via web from Richard Cunningham's posterous

Don't buy a Nokia N96

The contract on my Sony Ericsson k810i phone expired at end of last year. I'd not had much luck with that phone, the joystick controller failed in the same way the it happened on the Sony Ericsson T610 I had on the one before last phone I had. Not being able to navigate the phone basically made it unusable towards the end. I figured, I'd had bad experiences with Sony Ericssons both times, I'd bought them, and I had three different Nokias and they had all worked pretty well. This time, I thought I go back to Nokia. The Nokia N95 got rave reviews though for me I was also looking for something to replace my aging 20GB iPod. The Nokia N96 was the successor to the N95 which added 16GB internal memory and the option to add another 16GB, which I did.

I also looked at the iPhone, though at the time it only supported 16GB, had no video support, no bluetooth stereo (which are all fixed now) and it's a pain to work with Linux since you need iTunes to get stuff on and off it. So I decided on the N96.

Nokia's phones used to be popular because they were easy to use and reliable, but they have really messed up big time with this one. Here some of the areas I've kept on hitting problems over the last 9 months with this phone:

Startup
When you need to turn on the phone it can take about a minute to start, also, slide to lock the screen doesn't work all this time. Normally this wouldn't be much of a problem but the phone does sometimes crash so you end up booting it more that you should need to.

Address Book
On an old Nokia phone I could type the first letter of a person's name and it would jump right to it, now they match the beginning of any word so, it will match their surname and other bits I've added to the name like "house", "work" "mob" etc. (maybe I shouldn't use these anymore) so searching for "h", "w" or "m" brings up a lot of unwanted results.

Text Messages
First off, sometimes when you receive a text the phone can take a while to wake up and show you the text at all. When your viewing the text you don't see the date/time of the text, on old non-smartphone Nokia phones you would simply scroll down, on the N96 you have to go to Options → (scroll right down to) Message Details and then scroll that down to see the time - which is crazy when the screen is so big.

Email client
The mail client leaves a lot to be desired, with the default settings it runs out of memory even when it is the only program running with an inbox of 4,000 messages. I found that reducing my mailbox down to about 1500 messages helped this a bit, but still most of the time wouldn't let you read a message. In the end, I found that limited the number of messages was the best answer which can be done with the following from Email:

Options → E-mail settings → Retrieval settings → Retrieval amount → From Inbox = 50 (default: All) Even with this setting, I find it can take several minutes to check for new message, when I haven't used it for a few weeks.

Web Browser
The web browser seems fine in general unless you have used iPhone or iPod Touch before. I have recently bought an iPod touch and it's really easy to do a web search, change the page URL, use tabs, bookmarks basically everything you need. Nokia's browser is very poor in comparison. When it has to load external stylesheets it seems to load that at the end so you start reading the un-styled content for a few seconds and there is a big jump while the page changes. There is no multiple tab support.

MP3 Player
The music player does work some of the time. Occasionally it gets confused on a song and it starts stuttering and this can be fixed by pausing and un-pausing it again. Also, sometimes the phone will just simply crash and reboot while your listening to a song. A minor issue is that on my Sony Ericsson k810i I could pause/play and change volume all with out unlocking the phone, which was useful, on the n96 I have to unlock it every-time to do this (they do provide a wired remote which I don't find useful, and my iPod had one which I never used).

I've talked to a few people with Nokia N96s, and they report the same type of problems. I can't see a good reason to choose the Nokia N96, so my recommendation is to get something else.

This Week in Startups Episode 13

This Week in Startups is a video podcast by Jason Calacanis and some people from Mahalo. I've been meaning to write something about it for a while. Jason has a competition where you can win $500 at the Apple store by writing a review which made me finally write about it - though everything written here is my honest opinion of the show.

The show is about entrepreneurship and it's host Jason Calacanis has a fair amount of experience in this area by founding the Silicon Alley reporter magazine and Weblogs Inc (which sold to AOL). which produces Engadget and various other titles. Jason himself makes the show what it is by providing insight into entrepreneurship.

Jason wants people to specifically review episode 13 rather than the series in general - so lets get onto that.

The show kicked off this time with the Ask Jason segment where someone was asking about hardware startups - Jason's basic response was that it's because of the established players but it can be done.

The news - was read by Andrew Warner from Mixergy (usually Lon Haris but he is on holiday), Jason provided insights as normal to the news and that was pretty good - however this week, as in several other weeks, the news mostly concerned tech not startups specifically - I think given how the long the show is - the news should be dropped unless it can focus more on startup news rather than tech news in general as it does currently.

Jason's guest this week was Matt Mickiewicz who co-founded sitepoint, 99 designs and is working on a new site flippa where you can buy and sell websites. Jason did a good job of getting some key information out of Matt about how he started in a startup that I could see a lot of viewers relating to.

Jason has a new segment of the show which is the Shark Tank segment in which entrepreneurs pitch their business ideas to Jason, this seemed to go quite well though it seemed that business was at quite a late stage already anyway and I think it would have fitted better with businesses at the idea stage.

This episode has quite a chatty style and Jason is more laid back than everyone else (maybe because he is the boss) however this naturally leads into quite a long show which was 2 hours 20 mins this week. There needs to be someone directing to keep it moving with a time limit otherwise I think that there will be a drop off in viewers. In particular I think the news and the homework segments could be dropped to save time - however with better timing it should be possible to get through the segments in under 2 hours anyway. The only reservation I have about this, is that the show's style may change if they have to keep going at a certain rate.

Jason tells us in this episode that he is trying to innovate in advertising using the show. In this show he says he will give $20 and a Mahalo pack (supposedly worth $50) to the first 50 people to signup with audible. Jason also talks about the sponsors and tells people to mention them on Twitter.

The current set of sponsors are the same since the start with only the addition of audible recently. I don't think the sponsors should be the same on every show (though I realise this is easier to organise) because you get pitched the same companies every episode. Hearing what a company is doing for the first time is interesting, even though it's a advert, but hearing it for the 13th time is not that interesting.